Compare photos by overlapping


EQC 400 4MATIC vs PAJERO ZR




＜First car selection＞

Mercedes-Benz

EQC 400 4MATIC 2018- 56519

＜Second car selection＞

MITSUBISHI

PAJERO ZR 2006-2019 15750
#EQC 400 4MATIC 2018- + PAJERO ZR 2006-2019



#EQC 400 4MATIC 2018- + PAJERO ZR 2006-2019
#EQC 400 4MATIC 2018- + PAJERO ZR 2006-2019



Size comparison


A : EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
B : PAJERO ZR 2006-2019

name length width height
A 4770mm 1925mm 1625mm
B 4900mm 1845mm 1870mm
difference -130mm +80mm -245mm
name weight wheelbase Minimum turning radius
A 2495kg 2875mm 5.6m
B 2060kg 2780mm 5.7m
difference +435kg +95mm -0.1m
name Cargo Volume seats minimum ride height
A 500L 5 130mm
B L 7 225mm
difference +500L -2 -95mm


Max output comparison


A : EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
B : PAJERO ZR 2006-2019

name Gasoline engine power Gasoline engine torque Displacement
A ---
B 131kW(178PS)261Nm2972cc
difference ---

EV performance comparison
name Drive battery capacity cruising range Acceleration 0-100km/h
A 85kWh 471km 5.1sec
B 0kWh km sec
difference +85kWh +471km +5.1sec



Mercedes-Benz EQC 400 4MATIC 2018- 56519
Car manufacturer website
The first EV in Mercedes-Benz. The battery capacity is 80kWh, the range is 450km, but it actually has a smaller range, so EQC is likely to be weak on long-distance driving.



MITSUBISHI PAJERO ZR 2006-2019 15750
Car manufacturer website
The chassis is a ladder frame built-in monocoque body (the monocoque body is welded to the ladder frame that penetrates the front and back). Although it was proud of high rough road running performance, it was discontinued due to the times.




Mercedes-Benz EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-

>>Compare photos by overlapping




SUV 　 MPV 　 Hatchback 　 Wagon 　 Sedan 　 Coupe


<< < 1 >

Order of longest length
<< < 1 >



Back to top