Compare photos by overlapping
CX5 20S PROACTIVE vs EQA 250
＜First car selection＞
MAZDA
CX-5 20S PROACTIVE 2017-
＜Second car selection＞
Mercedes-Benz
EQA 250 2021-
Size comparison
A : CX-5 20S PROACTIVE 2017-
B : EQA 250 2021-
| name | length | width | height |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 4545mm | 1840mm | 1690mm |
| B | 4463mm | 1834mm | 1620mm |
| difference | +82mm | +6mm | +70mm |
| name | weight | Minimum turning radius | Drive battery capacity |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1530kg | 5.5m | kWh |
| B | 2040kg | m | 79.8kWh |
| difference | -510kg | +5.5m | -79.8kWh |
| name | Cargo Volume | Drive battery capacity | cruising range |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 500L | kWh | km |
| B | 340L | 79.8kWh | 426km |
| difference | +160L | -79.8kWh | -426km |
Max output comparison
| name | Gasoline engine power | Gasoline engine torque | Displacement |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | - | - | - |
| B | - | - | - |
| difference | - | - | - |
EV performance comparison
| name | Electric motor power | Electric motor torque | |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | kW | Nm | |
| B | 140kW | 375Nm | |
| difference | -140kW | -375Nm |
| name | Drive battery capacity | cruising range | Acceleration 0-100km/h |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | kWh | km | sec |
| B | 79.8kWh | 426km | 8.9sec |
| difference | -79.8kWh | -426km | -8.9sec |
MAZDA CX-5 20S PROACTIVE 2017-
Car manufacturer website
Car manufacturer website
Mercedes-Benz compact SUV EV. The EVs already on the market have EQC, but they are quite large SUVs. On the other hand, EQA is an EV that is a little more affordable and a little more affordable. Although the exterior and interior are similar to GLA, I like the fact that it has an advanced feel as an EV.
MAZDA CX-5 20S PROACTIVE 2017-
>>Compare photos by overlapping
new!
SUV MPV Hatchback Wagon Sedan Coupe Order of longest length
Back to top