Compare photos by overlapping
RIDGELINE vs TUNDRA
<First car selection>
HONDA
RIDGELINE 2016- 18299
<Second car selection>
TOYOTA
TUNDRA 2014- 23174
Size comparison
A : RIDGELINE 2016-
B : TUNDRA 2014-
name | length | width | height |
---|---|---|---|
A | 5335mm | 1995mm | 1785mm |
B | 5815mm | 2030mm | 1925mm |
difference | -480mm | -35mm | -140mm |
name | weight | wheelbase | Minimum turning radius |
---|---|---|---|
A | 1924kg | 3180mm | m |
B | 0kg | mm | m |
difference | +1924kg | +3180mm | +0m |
name | Cargo Volume | seats | minimum ride height |
---|---|---|---|
A | L | mm | |
B | L | 6 | mm |
difference | +0L | -6 | +0mm |
Max output comparison
A : RIDGELINE 2016-
B : TUNDRA 2014-
name | Gasoline engine power | Gasoline engine torque | Displacement |
---|---|---|---|
A | 221kW(301PS) | 353Nm | - |
B | 310kW(422PS) | 443Nm | - |
difference | -89kW | -90Nm | - |
EV performance comparison
HONDA RIDGELINE 2016-
18299
Car manufacturer website
Honda pickup truck. The size is imposing, and it is not defeated by Toyota. We are also paying attention to safety, such as equipping advanced safety equipment as standard equipment. Not sold in Japan.
TOYOTA TUNDRA 2014-
23174
Car manufacturer website
Toyota full-size pickup truck. The huge grill gets a lot of looks. Popular as a richer pickup truck.
HONDA RIDGELINE 2016-
>>Compare photos by overlapping
SUV MPV Hatchback Wagon Sedan Coupe
Order of longest length
Back to top