Compare photos by overlapping
RIDGELINE vs MUX
<First car selection>
HONDA
RIDGELINE 2016- 15330
<Second car selection>
ISUZU
MU-X 2013- 51795
Size comparison
A : RIDGELINE 2016-
B : MU-X 2013-
name | length | width | height |
---|---|---|---|
A | 5335mm | 1995mm | 1785mm |
B | 4825mm | 1860mm | 1825mm |
difference | +510mm | +135mm | -40mm |
name | weight | wheelbase | Minimum turning radius |
---|---|---|---|
A | 1924kg | 3180mm | m |
B | 0kg | mm | m |
difference | +1924kg | +3180mm | +0m |
name | Cargo Volume | seats | minimum ride height |
---|---|---|---|
A | L | mm | |
B | L | mm | |
difference | +0L | +0 | +0mm |
Max output comparison
A : RIDGELINE 2016-
B : MU-X 2013-
name | Gasoline engine power | Gasoline engine torque | Displacement |
---|---|---|---|
A | 221kW(301PS) | 353Nm | - |
B | - | - | - |
difference | - | - | - |
EV performance comparison
HONDA RIDGELINE 2016-
15330
Car manufacturer website
Honda pickup truck. The size is imposing, and it is not defeated by Toyota. We are also paying attention to safety, such as equipping advanced safety equipment as standard equipment. Not sold in Japan.
ISUZU MU-X 2013-
51795
Car manufacturer website
Although designed in 2013, its powerful driving and appearance make you feel like you can go anywhere. Only the makers who mainly make trucks can't help but tough.
HONDA RIDGELINE 2016-
>>Compare photos by overlapping
SUV MPV Hatchback Wagon Sedan Coupe
Order of longest length
Back to top