Compare photos by overlapping
CX8 25S vs AURA G
<First car selection>
MAZDA
CX-8 25S 2017- 20941
<Second car selection>
NISSAN
AURA G 2021- 14467
Size comparison
A : CX-8 25S 2017-
B : AURA G 2021-
name | length | width | height |
---|---|---|---|
A | 4900mm | 1840mm | 1730mm |
B | 4045mm | 1735mm | 1525mm |
difference | +855mm | +105mm | +205mm |
name | weight | wheelbase | Minimum turning radius |
---|---|---|---|
A | 1720kg | 2930mm | 5.8m |
B | 1260kg | 2580mm | 5.2m |
difference | +460kg | +350mm | +0.6m |
name | Cargo Volume | seats | minimum ride height |
---|---|---|---|
A | 239L | 7 | 200mm |
B | 340L | 5 | 130mm |
difference | -101L | +2 | +70mm |
Max output comparison
A : CX-8 25S 2017-
B : AURA G 2021-
name | Gasoline engine power | Gasoline engine torque | Displacement |
---|---|---|---|
A | - | - | - |
B | 60kW(82PS) | 103Nm | 1198cc |
difference | - | - | - |
EV performance comparison
name | Electric motor power(F) | Electric motor torque(F) | |
---|---|---|---|
A | - | - | |
B | 100kW(136PS) | 300Nm | |
difference | - | - |
name | Drive battery capacity | cruising range | Acceleration 0-100km/h |
---|---|---|---|
A | kWh | km | sec |
B | 2kWh | km | sec |
difference | -2kWh | +0km | +0sec |
MAZDA CX-8 25S 2017-
20941
Car manufacturer website
NISSAN AURA G 2021-
14467
Car manufacturer website
Nissan's luxury-oriented compact hatchback. Based on the notebook, every detail is thoroughly focused on luxury. It's a compact size car, and while there aren't many cars with a sense of luxury, the exterior and interior of the car are made with particular attention to texture. If you're looking for a car that's compact but doesn't look cheap, you should definitely consider this one.
MAZDA CX-8 25S 2017-
>>Compare photos by overlapping
SUV MPV Hatchback Wagon Sedan Coupe
Order of longest length
Back to top