Compare photos by overlapping


CX8 25S vs EQC 400 4MATIC




＜First car selection＞

MAZDA

CX-8 25S 2017- 19799

＜Second car selection＞

Mercedes-Benz

EQC 400 4MATIC 2018- 57460
#CX-8 25S 2017- + EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-



#CX-8 25S 2017- + EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
#CX-8 25S 2017- + EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-



Size comparison


A : CX-8 25S 2017-
B : EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-

name length width height
A 4900mm 1840mm 1730mm
B 4770mm 1925mm 1625mm
difference +130mm -85mm +105mm
name weight wheelbase Minimum turning radius
A 1720kg 2930mm 5.8m
B 2495kg 2875mm 5.6m
difference -775kg +55mm +0.2m
name Cargo Volume seats minimum ride height
A 239L 7 200mm
B 500L 5 130mm
difference -261L +2 +70mm


Max output comparison


A : CX-8 25S 2017-
B : EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-

name Gasoline engine power Gasoline engine torque Displacement
A ---
B ---
difference ---

EV performance comparison
name Drive battery capacity cruising range Acceleration 0-100km/h
A kWh km sec
B 85kWh 471km 5.1sec
difference -85kWh -471km -5.1sec



MAZDA CX-8 25S 2017- 19799
Car manufacturer website



Mercedes-Benz EQC 400 4MATIC 2018- 57460
Car manufacturer website
The first EV in Mercedes-Benz. The battery capacity is 80kWh, the range is 450km, but it actually has a smaller range, so EQC is likely to be weak on long-distance driving.




MAZDA CX-8 25S 2017-

>>Compare photos by overlapping




SUV 　 MPV 　 Hatchback 　 Wagon 　 Sedan 　 Coupe


<< < 1 >

Order of longest length
<< < 1 >



Back to top