Compare photos by overlapping
RIDGELINE vs CX8 25S
<First car selection>
HONDA
RIDGELINE 2016- 15358
<Second car selection>
MAZDA
CX-8 25S 2017- 19942
Size comparison
A : RIDGELINE 2016-
B : CX-8 25S 2017-
name | length | width | height |
---|---|---|---|
A | 5335mm | 1995mm | 1785mm |
B | 4900mm | 1840mm | 1730mm |
difference | +435mm | +155mm | +55mm |
name | weight | wheelbase | Minimum turning radius |
---|---|---|---|
A | 1924kg | 3180mm | m |
B | 1720kg | 2930mm | 5.8m |
difference | +204kg | +250mm | -5.8m |
name | Cargo Volume | seats | minimum ride height |
---|---|---|---|
A | L | mm | |
B | 239L | 7 | 200mm |
difference | -239L | -7 | -200mm |
Max output comparison
A : RIDGELINE 2016-
B : CX-8 25S 2017-
name | Gasoline engine power | Gasoline engine torque | Displacement |
---|---|---|---|
A | 221kW(301PS) | 353Nm | - |
B | - | - | - |
difference | - | - | - |
EV performance comparison
HONDA RIDGELINE 2016-
15358
Car manufacturer website
Honda pickup truck. The size is imposing, and it is not defeated by Toyota. We are also paying attention to safety, such as equipping advanced safety equipment as standard equipment. Not sold in Japan.
MAZDA CX-8 25S 2017-
19942
Car manufacturer website
HONDA RIDGELINE 2016-
>>Compare photos by overlapping
SUV MPV Hatchback Wagon Sedan Coupe
Order of longest length
Back to top