Compare photos by overlapping
CAMARO vs EQB 350 4MATIC
<First car selection>
CHEVROLET
CAMARO 2015- 13266
<Second car selection>
Mercedes-Benz
EQB 350 4MATIC 2021- 15636
Size comparison
A : CAMARO 2015-
B : EQB 350 4MATIC 2021-
name | length | width | height |
---|---|---|---|
A | 4785mm | 1900mm | 1345mm |
B | 4685mm | 1885mm | 1705mm |
difference | +100mm | +15mm | -360mm |
name | weight | wheelbase | Minimum turning radius |
---|---|---|---|
A | 1560kg | mm | m |
B | 2160kg | 2830mm | 5.5m |
difference | -600kg | -2830mm | -5.5m |
name | Cargo Volume | seats | minimum ride height |
---|---|---|---|
A | L | mm | |
B | 110L | 7 | 205mm |
difference | -110L | -7 | -205mm |
Max output comparison
A : CAMARO 2015-
B : EQB 350 4MATIC 2021-
name | Gasoline engine power | Gasoline engine torque | Displacement |
---|---|---|---|
A | - | - | - |
B | - | - | - |
difference | - | - | - |
EV performance comparison
name | Electric motor power(F) | Electric motor torque(F) | |
---|---|---|---|
A | - | - | |
B | 143kW(194PS) | 370Nm | |
difference | - | - |
name | Electric motor power(R) | Electric motor torque(R) | |
---|---|---|---|
A | - | - | |
B | 72kW(98PS) | 150Nm | |
difference | - | - |
name | Drive battery capacity | cruising range | Acceleration 0-100km/h |
---|---|---|---|
A | kWh | km | sec |
B | 67kWh | 520km | sec |
difference | -67kWh | -520km | +0sec |
CHEVROLET CAMARO 2015-
13266
Car manufacturer website
2-door FR vehicle. By using aluminum everywhere, we have achieved a weight reduction of 90kg or more and a 28% increase in rigidity over the previous generation. It looks overwhelmingly cool.
Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 4MATIC 2021-
15636
Car manufacturer website
Comming soon...
CHEVROLET CAMARO 2015-
>>Compare photos by overlapping
SUV MPV Hatchback Wagon Sedan Coupe
Order of longest length
Back to top