Compare photos by overlapping
ECLIPSE CROSS G vs RDX
<First car selection>
MITSUBISHI
ECLIPSE CROSS G 2017- 14771
<Second car selection>
ACURA
RDX 2018- 51658
Size comparison
A : ECLIPSE CROSS G 2017-
B : RDX 2018-
name | length | width | height |
---|---|---|---|
A | 4405mm | 1805mm | 1685mm |
B | 4744mm | 1900mm | 1669mm |
difference | -339mm | -95mm | +16mm |
name | weight | wheelbase | Minimum turning radius |
---|---|---|---|
A | 1460kg | 2670mm | 5.4m |
B | 1716kg | mm | m |
difference | -256kg | +2670mm | +5.4m |
name | Cargo Volume | seats | minimum ride height |
---|---|---|---|
A | L | 5 | 175mm |
B | L | mm | |
difference | +0L | +5 | +175mm |
Max output comparison
A : ECLIPSE CROSS G 2017-
B : RDX 2018-
name | Gasoline engine power | Gasoline engine torque | Displacement |
---|---|---|---|
A | 110kW(150PS) | 240Nm | 1498cc |
B | - | - | - |
difference | - | - | - |
EV performance comparison
MITSUBISHI ECLIPSE CROSS G 2017-
14771
Car manufacturer website
ACURA RDX 2018-
51658
Car manufacturer website
ACURA SUV. Until now, the CR-V compliant RDX platform was newly developed exclusively for the Acura brand, and this platform will be rolled out to ACURA. I would like to expect ACURA to have a different character from HONDA.
MITSUBISHI ECLIPSE CROSS G 2017-
>>Compare photos by overlapping
SUV MPV Hatchback Wagon Sedan Coupe
Order of longest length
like! | name | length | width | height |
---|---|---|---|---|
24168 | MITSUBISHI ECLIPSE CROSS PHEV 2020- | 4545 | 1805 | 1685 |
14218 | MITSUBISHI PAJERO Short VR-I 2006-2019 | 4385 | 1845 | 1850 |
Back to top