Compare photos by overlapping


MUX vs XC40 Recharge Plugin hybrid T5 Inscription




<First car selection>

ISUZU

MU-X 2013- 55650

<Second car selection>

VOLVO

XC40 Recharge Plug-in hybrid T5 Inscription 2018- 18401





Size comparison


A : MU-X 2013-
B : XC40 Recharge Plug-in hybrid T5 Inscription 2018-

name length width height
A 4825mm 1860mm 1825mm
B 4425mm 1875mm 1660mm
difference +400mm -15mm +165mm

name weight Minimum turning radius Drive battery capacity
A 0kg m kWh
B 1810kg 5.7m 11kWh
difference -1810kg -5.7m -11kWh

name Cargo Volume Drive battery capacity cruising range
A L kWh km
B L 11kWh km
difference +0L -11kWh +0km


Max output comparison
name Gasoline engine power Gasoline engine torque Displacement
A ---
B 132kW(180PS)265Nm1476cc
difference ---


EV performance comparison
name Electric motor power Electric motor torque
A kW Nm
B kW Nm
difference +0kW +0Nm


name Drive battery capacity cruising range Acceleration 0-100km/h
A kWh km sec
B 11kWh km sec
difference -11kWh +0km +0sec


ISUZU MU-X 2013-
Car manufacturer website
Although designed in 2013, its powerful driving and appearance make you feel like you can go anywhere. Only the makers who mainly make trucks can't help but tough.


VOLVO XC40 Recharge Plug-in hybrid T5 Inscription 2018-
Car manufacturer website
Volvo's smallest plug-in hybrid SUV. By combining a 1500cc engine and an electric motor that can output 60kW, EV driving of 10km or more is possible. As a plug-in hybrid, one of the attractions is the slightly reduced price.










ISUZU MU-X 2013-

>>Compare photos by overlapping


new!




SUV   MPV   Hatchback   Wagon   Sedan Coupe
<< < 1 >

Order of longest length
<< < 1 >



Back to top