Compare photos by overlapping


ELGRAND 250 XG vs CHR HYBRID G




<First car selection>

NISSAN

ELGRAND 250 XG 2010- 23228

<Second car selection>

TOYOTA

C-HR HYBRID G 2016- 20582





Size comparison


A : ELGRAND 250 XG 2010-
B : C-HR HYBRID G 2016-

name length width height
A 4915mm 1850mm 1815mm
B 4360mm 1795mm 1550mm
difference +555mm +55mm +265mm

name weight Minimum turning radius Drive battery capacity
A 1910kg 5.4m kWh
B 1480kg 5.2m 1.31kWh
difference +430kg +0.2m -1.31kWh

name Cargo Volume Drive battery capacity cruising range
A L kWh km
B 318L 1.31kWh km
difference -318L -1.31kWh +0km


Max output comparison
name Gasoline engine power Gasoline engine torque Displacement
A 125kW(170PS)245Nm2488cc
B 72kW(98PS)142Nm1797cc
difference +53kW+103Nm+691cc


EV performance comparison
name Electric motor power Electric motor torque
A kW Nm
B 53kW 163Nm
difference -53kW -163Nm


name Drive battery capacity cruising range Acceleration 0-100km/h
A kWh km sec
B 1.31kWh km sec
difference -1.31kWh +0km +0sec


NISSAN ELGRAND 250 XG 2010-
Car manufacturer website
Nissan's luxury minivan. Even in a minivan, the low body position gives it a sportier atmosphere compared to Toyota's Alphard.










TOYOTA C-HR HYBRID G 2016-
Car manufacturer website
Toyota compact SUV. The styling that thoroughly sticks to its appearance makes us feel the new era of SUV.






NISSAN ELGRAND 250 XG 2010-

>>Compare photos by overlapping


new!




SUV   MPV   Hatchback   Wagon   Sedan Coupe
<< < 1 >

Order of longest length
<< < 1 >



Back to top