Compare photos by overlapping
EQC 400 4MATIC vs CHR HYBRID G
<First car selection>
Mercedes-Benz
EQC 400 4MATIC 2018- 56751
<Second car selection>
TOYOTA
C-HR HYBRID G 2016- 18561
Size comparison
A : EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
B : C-HR HYBRID G 2016-
name | length | width | height |
---|---|---|---|
A | 4770mm | 1925mm | 1625mm |
B | 4360mm | 1795mm | 1550mm |
difference | +410mm | +130mm | +75mm |
name | weight | wheelbase | Minimum turning radius |
---|---|---|---|
A | 2495kg | 2875mm | 5.6m |
B | 1480kg | 2640mm | 5.2m |
difference | +1015kg | +235mm | +0.4m |
name | Cargo Volume | seats | minimum ride height |
---|---|---|---|
A | 500L | 5 | 130mm |
B | 318L | 5 | 140mm |
difference | +182L | +0 | -10mm |
Max output comparison
A : EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
B : C-HR HYBRID G 2016-
name | Gasoline engine power | Gasoline engine torque | Displacement |
---|---|---|---|
A | - | - | - |
B | 72kW(98PS) | 142Nm | 1797cc |
difference | - | - | - |
EV performance comparison
name | Drive battery capacity | cruising range | Acceleration 0-100km/h |
---|---|---|---|
A | 85kWh | 471km | 5.1sec |
B | 1.31kWh | km | sec |
difference | +83.7kWh | +471km | +5.1sec |
Mercedes-Benz EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
56751
Car manufacturer website
The first EV in Mercedes-Benz. The battery capacity is 80kWh, the range is 450km, but it actually has a smaller range, so EQC is likely to be weak on long-distance driving.
TOYOTA C-HR HYBRID G 2016-
18561
Car manufacturer website
Toyota compact SUV. The styling that thoroughly sticks to its appearance makes us feel the new era of SUV.
Mercedes-Benz EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
>>Compare photos by overlapping
SUV MPV Hatchback Wagon Sedan Coupe
Order of longest length
Back to top