Compare photos by overlapping


Mustang vs ELGRAND 250 XG




<First car selection>

Ford

Mustang 2015- 24964

<Second car selection>

NISSAN

ELGRAND 250 XG 2010- 23607





Size comparison


A : Mustang 2015-
B : ELGRAND 250 XG 2010-

name length width height
A 4784mm 1916mm 1381mm
B 4915mm 1850mm 1815mm
difference -131mm +66mm -434mm

name weight Minimum turning radius Drive battery capacity
A 1600kg m kWh
B 1910kg 5.4m kWh
difference -310kg -5.4m +0kWh

name Cargo Volume Drive battery capacity cruising range
A L kWh km
B L kWh km
difference +0L +0kWh +0km


Max output comparison
name Gasoline engine power Gasoline engine torque Displacement
A ---
B 125kW(170PS)245Nm2488cc
difference ---


EV performance comparison
name Electric motor power Electric motor torque
A kW Nm
B kW Nm
difference +0kW +0Nm


name Drive battery capacity cruising range Acceleration 0-100km/h
A kWh km sec
B kWh km sec
difference +0kWh +0km +0sec


Ford Mustang 2015-
Car manufacturer website
The low, overwhelmingly supple form is unique to Ford Mustangs. The ruggedness of American cars is irresistible to fans.


NISSAN ELGRAND 250 XG 2010-
Car manufacturer website
Nissan's luxury minivan. Even in a minivan, the low body position gives it a sportier atmosphere compared to Toyota's Alphard.










Ford Mustang 2015-

>>Compare photos by overlapping


new!




SUV   MPV   Hatchback   Wagon   Sedan Coupe
<< < 1 >

Order of longest length
<< < 1 >



Back to top