Compare photos by overlapping


ELGRAND 250 XG vs CX4




<First car selection>

NISSAN

ELGRAND 250 XG 2010- 22348

<Second car selection>

MAZDA

CX-4 2016- 12428





Size comparison


A : ELGRAND 250 XG 2010-
B : CX-4 2016-

name length width height
A 4915mm 1850mm 1815mm
B 4633mm 1840mm 1535mm
difference +282mm +10mm +280mm

name weight Minimum turning radius Drive battery capacity
A 1910kg 5.4m kWh
B 0kg m kWh
difference +1910kg +5.4m +0kWh

name Cargo Volume Drive battery capacity cruising range
A L kWh km
B L kWh km
difference +0L +0kWh +0km


Max output comparison
name Gasoline engine power Gasoline engine torque Displacement
A 125kW(170PS)245Nm2488cc
B 140kW(190PS)252Nm2488cc
difference -15kW-7Nm+0cc


EV performance comparison
name Electric motor power Electric motor torque
A kW Nm
B kW Nm
difference +0kW +0Nm


name Drive battery capacity cruising range Acceleration 0-100km/h
A kWh km sec
B kWh km sec
difference +0kWh +0km +0sec


NISSAN ELGRAND 250 XG 2010-
Car manufacturer website
Nissan's luxury minivan. Even in a minivan, the low body position gives it a sportier atmosphere compared to Toyota's Alphard.










MAZDA CX-4 2016-
Car manufacturer website
Mazda SUV sold in China. A model that shares a platform with the CX-5 and has a lower coupe-like styling. If you want a more stylish car that is the size of the CX-5, I would like to choose this CX-4.


NISSAN ELGRAND 250 XG 2010-

>>Compare photos by overlapping


new!




SUV   MPV   Hatchback   Wagon   Sedan Coupe
<< < 1 >

Order of longest length
<< < 1 >



Back to top