Compare photos by overlapping
EXPANDER CROSS vs RIDGELINE
<First car selection>
MITSUBISHI
EXPANDER CROSS 2020- 13691
<Second car selection>
HONDA
RIDGELINE 2016- 18335
Size comparison
A : EXPANDER CROSS 2020-
B : RIDGELINE 2016-
name | length | width | height |
---|---|---|---|
A | 4475mm | 1800mm | 1700mm |
B | 5335mm | 1995mm | 1785mm |
difference | -860mm | -195mm | -85mm |
name | weight | wheelbase | Minimum turning radius |
---|---|---|---|
A | 0kg | mm | m |
B | 1924kg | 3180mm | m |
difference | -1924kg | -3180mm | +0m |
name | Cargo Volume | seats | minimum ride height |
---|---|---|---|
A | L | mm | |
B | L | mm | |
difference | +0L | +0 | +0mm |
Max output comparison
A : EXPANDER CROSS 2020-
B : RIDGELINE 2016-
name | Gasoline engine power | Gasoline engine torque | Displacement |
---|---|---|---|
A | - | - | - |
B | 221kW(301PS) | 353Nm | - |
difference | - | - | - |
EV performance comparison
MITSUBISHI EXPANDER CROSS 2020-
13691
Car manufacturer website
HONDA RIDGELINE 2016-
18335
Car manufacturer website
Honda pickup truck. The size is imposing, and it is not defeated by Toyota. We are also paying attention to safety, such as equipping advanced safety equipment as standard equipment. Not sold in Japan.
MITSUBISHI EXPANDER CROSS 2020-
>>Compare photos by overlapping
SUV MPV Hatchback Wagon Sedan Coupe
Order of longest length
Back to top