Compare photos by overlapping


MUX vs RIDGELINE




＜First car selection＞

ISUZU

MU-X 2013- 50651

＜Second car selection＞

HONDA

RIDGELINE 2016- 15019
#MU-X 2013- + RIDGELINE 2016-



#MU-X 2013- + RIDGELINE 2016-
#MU-X 2013- + RIDGELINE 2016-



Size comparison


A : MU-X 2013-
B : RIDGELINE 2016-

name length width height
A 4825mm 1860mm 1825mm
B 5335mm 1995mm 1785mm
difference -510mm -135mm +40mm
name weight wheelbase Minimum turning radius
A 0kg mm m
B 1924kg 3180mm m
difference -1924kg -3180mm +0m
name Cargo Volume seats minimum ride height
A L mm
B L mm
difference +0L +0 +0mm


Max output comparison


A : MU-X 2013-
B : RIDGELINE 2016-

name Gasoline engine power Gasoline engine torque Displacement
A ---
B 221kW(301PS)353Nm-
difference ---

EV performance comparison



ISUZU MU-X 2013- 50651
Car manufacturer website
Although designed in 2013, its powerful driving and appearance make you feel like you can go anywhere. Only the makers who mainly make trucks can't help but tough.



HONDA RIDGELINE 2016- 15019
Car manufacturer website
Honda pickup truck. The size is imposing, and it is not defeated by Toyota. We are also paying attention to safety, such as equipping advanced safety equipment as standard equipment. Not sold in Japan.




ISUZU MU-X 2013-

>>Compare photos by overlapping




SUV 　 MPV 　 Hatchback 　 Wagon 　 Sedan 　 Coupe


<< < 1 >

Order of longest length
<< < 1 >



Back to top