Compare photos by overlapping
RIDGELINE vs Mustang
<First car selection>
HONDA
RIDGELINE 2016- 15231
<Second car selection>
Ford
Mustang 2015- 22539
Size comparison
A : RIDGELINE 2016-
B : Mustang 2015-
name | length | width | height |
---|---|---|---|
A | 5335mm | 1995mm | 1785mm |
B | 4784mm | 1916mm | 1381mm |
difference | +551mm | +79mm | +404mm |
name | weight | wheelbase | Minimum turning radius |
---|---|---|---|
A | 1924kg | 3180mm | m |
B | 1600kg | mm | m |
difference | +324kg | +3180mm | +0m |
name | Cargo Volume | seats | minimum ride height |
---|---|---|---|
A | L | mm | |
B | L | mm | |
difference | +0L | +0 | +0mm |
Max output comparison
A : RIDGELINE 2016-
B : Mustang 2015-
name | Gasoline engine power | Gasoline engine torque | Displacement |
---|---|---|---|
A | 221kW(301PS) | 353Nm | - |
B | - | - | - |
difference | - | - | - |
EV performance comparison
HONDA RIDGELINE 2016-
15231
Car manufacturer website
Honda pickup truck. The size is imposing, and it is not defeated by Toyota. We are also paying attention to safety, such as equipping advanced safety equipment as standard equipment. Not sold in Japan.
Ford Mustang 2015-
22539
Car manufacturer website
The low, overwhelmingly supple form is unique to Ford Mustangs. The ruggedness of American cars is irresistible to fans.
HONDA RIDGELINE 2016-
>>Compare photos by overlapping
SUV MPV Hatchback Wagon Sedan Coupe
Order of longest length
Back to top