Compare photos by overlapping
RIDGELINE vs CAMARO
<First car selection>
HONDA
RIDGELINE 2016- 15240
<Second car selection>
CHEVROLET
CAMARO 2015- 12794
Size comparison
A : RIDGELINE 2016-
B : CAMARO 2015-
name | length | width | height |
---|---|---|---|
A | 5335mm | 1995mm | 1785mm |
B | 4785mm | 1900mm | 1345mm |
difference | +550mm | +95mm | +440mm |
name | weight | wheelbase | Minimum turning radius |
---|---|---|---|
A | 1924kg | 3180mm | m |
B | 1560kg | mm | m |
difference | +364kg | +3180mm | +0m |
name | Cargo Volume | seats | minimum ride height |
---|---|---|---|
A | L | mm | |
B | L | mm | |
difference | +0L | +0 | +0mm |
Max output comparison
A : RIDGELINE 2016-
B : CAMARO 2015-
name | Gasoline engine power | Gasoline engine torque | Displacement |
---|---|---|---|
A | 221kW(301PS) | 353Nm | - |
B | - | - | - |
difference | - | - | - |
EV performance comparison
HONDA RIDGELINE 2016-
15240
Car manufacturer website
Honda pickup truck. The size is imposing, and it is not defeated by Toyota. We are also paying attention to safety, such as equipping advanced safety equipment as standard equipment. Not sold in Japan.
CHEVROLET CAMARO 2015-
12794
Car manufacturer website
2-door FR vehicle. By using aluminum everywhere, we have achieved a weight reduction of 90kg or more and a 28% increase in rigidity over the previous generation. It looks overwhelmingly cool.
HONDA RIDGELINE 2016-
>>Compare photos by overlapping
SUV MPV Hatchback Wagon Sedan Coupe
Order of longest length
Back to top