Compare photos by overlapping
S2000 type S MT vs Mustang
<First car selection>
HONDA
S2000 type S MT 1999-2009 12740
<Second car selection>
Ford
Mustang 2015- 22560
Size comparison
A : S2000 type S MT 1999-2009
B : Mustang 2015-
name | length | width | height |
---|---|---|---|
A | 4135mm | 1750mm | 1285mm |
B | 4784mm | 1916mm | 1381mm |
difference | -649mm | -166mm | -96mm |
name | weight | wheelbase | Minimum turning radius |
---|---|---|---|
A | 1260kg | 2400mm | 5.4m |
B | 1600kg | mm | m |
difference | -340kg | +2400mm | +5.4m |
name | Cargo Volume | seats | minimum ride height |
---|---|---|---|
A | L | 2 | mm |
B | L | mm | |
difference | +0L | +2 | +0mm |
Max output comparison
A : S2000 type S MT 1999-2009
B : Mustang 2015-
name | Gasoline engine power | Gasoline engine torque | Displacement |
---|---|---|---|
A | 178kW(242PS) | 221Nm | 2156cc |
B | - | - | - |
difference | - | - | - |
EV performance comparison
HONDA S2000 type S MT 1999-2009
12740
Car manufacturer website
A convertible FR sports car released by Honda in 1999. The 2-liter NA engine is extremely popular with fans. With an engine that can rotate up to 9,000 rpm, I enjoyed sports driving, but in 2009, it was discontinued.
Ford Mustang 2015-
22560
Car manufacturer website
The low, overwhelmingly supple form is unique to Ford Mustangs. The ruggedness of American cars is irresistible to fans.
HONDA S2000 type S MT 1999-2009
>>Compare photos by overlapping
SUV MPV Hatchback Wagon Sedan Coupe
Order of longest length
like! | name | length | width | height |
---|---|---|---|---|
12740 | HONDA S2000 type S MT 1999-2009 | 4135 | 1750 | 1285 |
13245 | HONDA S660 α MT 2015- | 3395 | 1475 | 1180 |
Back to top