Compare photos by overlapping
4C vs RIDGELINE
<First car selection>
Alfa Romeo
4C 2013- 10329
<Second car selection>
HONDA
RIDGELINE 2016- 15489
Size comparison
A : 4C 2013-
B : RIDGELINE 2016-
name | length | width | height |
---|---|---|---|
A | 3990mm | 1870mm | 1185mm |
B | 5335mm | 1995mm | 1785mm |
difference | -1345mm | -125mm | -600mm |
name | weight | wheelbase | Minimum turning radius |
---|---|---|---|
A | 1050kg | mm | 5.5m |
B | 1924kg | 3180mm | m |
difference | -874kg | -3180mm | +5.5m |
name | Cargo Volume | seats | minimum ride height |
---|---|---|---|
A | L | mm | |
B | L | mm | |
difference | +0L | +0 | +0mm |
Max output comparison
A : 4C 2013-
B : RIDGELINE 2016-
name | Gasoline engine power | Gasoline engine torque | Displacement |
---|---|---|---|
A | - | - | - |
B | 221kW(301PS) | 353Nm | - |
difference | - | - | - |
EV performance comparison
Alfa Romeo 4C 2013-
10329
Car manufacturer website
Alfa Romeo 2-door coupe. The beautiful styling that is divided as the sports car is a masterpiece. The carbon monocoque body has achieved a considerable weight reduction.
HONDA RIDGELINE 2016-
15489
Car manufacturer website
Honda pickup truck. The size is imposing, and it is not defeated by Toyota. We are also paying attention to safety, such as equipping advanced safety equipment as standard equipment. Not sold in Japan.
Alfa Romeo 4C 2013-
>>Compare photos by overlapping
SUV MPV Hatchback Wagon Sedan Coupe
Ascending order of total length
Back to top