Compare photos by overlapping
RANGE ROVER VELAR 250PS vs X5 xDrive 50e M sports
＜First car selection＞
Volks wagen
Audi
Porsche
TOYOTA
LEXUS
MAZDA
NISSAN
MITSUBISHI
Ford
CHEVROLET
Mercedes-Benz
BMW
HONDA
Tesla
VOLVO
Peugeot
CITROEN
DS
LAND ROVER
HYUNDAI
FIAT
JeepLAND ROVER
RANGE ROVER VELAR 250PS 2017-
13219＜Second car selection＞
BMW
X5 xDrive 50e M sports 2023-
10028Size comparison
A : RANGE ROVER VELAR 250PS 2017-
B : X5 xDrive 50e M sports 2023-
| name | length | width | height |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 4820mm | 1930mm | 1685mm |
| B | 4935mm | 2004mm | 1755mm |
| difference | -115mm | -74mm | -70mm |
| name | weight | wheelbase | Minimum turning radius |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1980kg | 2875mm | 5.6m |
| B | 0kg | 2975mm | m |
| difference | +1980kg | -100mm | +5.6m |
| name | Cargo Volume | seats | minimum ride height |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 673L | 5 | 205mm |
| B | L | mm | |
| difference | +673L | +5 | +205mm |
Max output comparison
A : RANGE ROVER VELAR 250PS 2017-
B : X5 xDrive 50e M sports 2023-
| name | Gasoline engine power | Gasoline engine torque | Displacement |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 184kW(250PS) | 365Nm | - |
| B | 230kW(313PS) | 450Nm | 2997cc |
| difference | -46kW | -85Nm | - |
EV performance comparison
| name | Drive battery capacity | cruising range | Acceleration 0-100km/h |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | kWh | km | sec |
| B | 25.7kWh | 110km | 4.8sec |
| difference | -25.7kWh | -110km | -4.8sec |
LAND ROVER RANGE ROVER VELAR 250PS 2017-
13219
Car manufacturer website
RANGE ROVER middle class SUV. The appearance of the urban image of RANGE ROVER is that the large and low body is cool. The advanced quality of the RANGE ROVER unified interior makes me amazed at the quality.
BMW X5 xDrive 50e M sports 2023-
10028
Car manufacturer website
LAND ROVER RANGE ROVER VELAR 250PS 2017-
>>Compare photos by overlapping
SUV MPV Hatchback Wagon Sedan Coupe
Order of longest length
Back to top