Compare photos by overlapping


SERENA epower G vs CX8 25S




＜First car selection＞

NISSAN

SERENA e-power G 2017- 18326

＜Second car selection＞

MAZDA

CX-8 25S 2017- 19605
#SERENA e-power G 2017- + CX-8 25S 2017-



#SERENA e-power G 2017- + CX-8 25S 2017-
#SERENA e-power G 2017- + CX-8 25S 2017-



Size comparison


A : SERENA e-power G 2017-
B : CX-8 25S 2017-

name length width height
A 4685mm 1695mm 1865mm
B 4900mm 1840mm 1730mm
difference -215mm -145mm +135mm
name weight wheelbase Minimum turning radius
A 1760kg 2860mm 5.5m
B 1720kg 2930mm 5.8m
difference +40kg -70mm -0.3m
name Cargo Volume seats minimum ride height
A L 7 140mm
B 239L 7 200mm
difference -239L +0 -60mm


Max output comparison


A : SERENA e-power G 2017-
B : CX-8 25S 2017-

name Gasoline engine power Gasoline engine torque Displacement
A 62kW(84PS)103Nm1198cc
B ---
difference ---

EV performance comparison
name Drive battery capacity cruising range Acceleration 0-100km/h
A 1.8kWh km sec
B kWh km sec
difference +1.8kWh +0km +0sec



NISSAN SERENA e-power G 2017- 18326
Car manufacturer website
Even with the large body of a minivan, by using the same power e-power as the EV, there is powerful torque from low speeds, so it is very comfortable. However, the fuel is gasoline and cannot be charged from the outside.
When you actually ride it, it runs powerfully and lightly from the low speed range with the power of electricity. It makes me realize that the heavy minivan and the torque of the motor are very compatible.
When the engine for power generation is not running, the inside of the car is very quiet, but when running slowly in an urban area, when the engine starts, I was a little worried about the engine noise.















MAZDA CX-8 25S 2017- 19605
Car manufacturer website




NISSAN SERENA e-power G 2017-

>>Compare photos by overlapping




SUV 　 MPV 　 Hatchback 　 Wagon 　 Sedan 　 Coupe


<< < 1 >

Order of longest length
<< < 1 >



Back to top