Compare photos by overlapping


XM vs CHR HYBRID G




<First car selection>

BMW

XM 2023- 10398

<Second car selection>

TOYOTA

C-HR HYBRID G 2016- 20082





Size comparison


A : XM 2023-
B : C-HR HYBRID G 2016-

name length width height
A 5110mm 2005mm 1755mm
B 4360mm 1795mm 1550mm
difference +750mm +210mm +205mm

name weight Minimum turning radius Drive battery capacity
A 2710kg m 29kWh
B 1480kg 5.2m 1.31kWh
difference +1230kg -5.2m +27.69kWh

name Cargo Volume Drive battery capacity cruising range
A L 29kWh km
B 318L 1.31kWh km
difference -318L +27.69kWh +0km


Max output comparison
name Gasoline engine power Gasoline engine torque Displacement
A 360kW(490PS)650Nm4395cc
B 72kW(98PS)142Nm1797cc
difference +288kW+508Nm+2598cc


EV performance comparison
name Electric motor power Electric motor torque
A kW Nm
B 53kW 163Nm
difference -53kW -163Nm


name Drive battery capacity cruising range Acceleration 0-100km/h
A 29kWh km sec
B 1.31kWh km sec
difference +27.69kWh +0km +0sec


BMW XM 2023-
Car manufacturer website


TOYOTA C-HR HYBRID G 2016-
Car manufacturer website
Toyota compact SUV. The styling that thoroughly sticks to its appearance makes us feel the new era of SUV.






BMW XM 2023-

>>Compare photos by overlapping


new!




SUV   MPV   Hatchback   Wagon   Sedan Coupe
<< < 1 >

Order of longest length
<< < 1 >



Back to top