Compare photos by overlapping


CHEROKEE vs CHR HYBRID G




<First car selection>

Jeep

CHEROKEE 2013- 14512

<Second car selection>

TOYOTA

C-HR HYBRID G 2016- 20867





Size comparison


A : CHEROKEE 2013-
B : C-HR HYBRID G 2016-

name length width height
A 4665mm 1860mm 1700mm
B 4360mm 1795mm 1550mm
difference +305mm +65mm +150mm

name weight Minimum turning radius Drive battery capacity
A 1760kg 5.8m kWh
B 1480kg 5.2m 1.31kWh
difference +280kg +0.6m -1.31kWh

name Cargo Volume Drive battery capacity cruising range
A L kWh km
B 318L 1.31kWh km
difference -318L -1.31kWh +0km


Max output comparison
name Gasoline engine power Gasoline engine torque Displacement
A ---
B 72kW(98PS)142Nm1797cc
difference ---


EV performance comparison
name Electric motor power Electric motor torque
A kW Nm
B 53kW 163Nm
difference -53kW -163Nm


name Drive battery capacity cruising range Acceleration 0-100km/h
A kWh km sec
B 1.31kWh km sec
difference -1.31kWh +0km +0sec


Jeep CHEROKEE 2013-
Car manufacturer website
Compact SUV in JEEP. It has a cute appearance while retaining the atmosphere of JEEP.


TOYOTA C-HR HYBRID G 2016-
Car manufacturer website
Toyota compact SUV. The styling that thoroughly sticks to its appearance makes us feel the new era of SUV.






Jeep CHEROKEE 2013-

>>Compare photos by overlapping


new!




SUV   MPV   Hatchback   Wagon   Sedan Coupe
<< < 1 >

Order of longest length
<< < 1 >



Back to top