Compare photos by overlapping


CHEROKEE vs EQC 400 4MATIC




＜First car selection＞

Jeep

CHEROKEE 2013- 13251

＜Second car selection＞

Mercedes-Benz

EQC 400 4MATIC 2018- 57184
#CHEROKEE 2013- + EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-



#CHEROKEE 2013- + EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
#CHEROKEE 2013- + EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-



Size comparison


A : CHEROKEE 2013-
B : EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-

name length width height
A 4665mm 1860mm 1700mm
B 4770mm 1925mm 1625mm
difference -105mm -65mm +75mm
name weight wheelbase Minimum turning radius
A 1760kg mm 5.8m
B 2495kg 2875mm 5.6m
difference -735kg -2875mm +0.2m
name Cargo Volume seats minimum ride height
A L mm
B 500L 5 130mm
difference -500L -5 -130mm


Max output comparison


A : CHEROKEE 2013-
B : EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-

name Gasoline engine power Gasoline engine torque Displacement
A ---
B ---
difference ---

EV performance comparison
name Drive battery capacity cruising range Acceleration 0-100km/h
A kWh km sec
B 85kWh 471km 5.1sec
difference -85kWh -471km -5.1sec



Jeep CHEROKEE 2013- 13251
Car manufacturer website
Compact SUV in JEEP. It has a cute appearance while retaining the atmosphere of JEEP.



Mercedes-Benz EQC 400 4MATIC 2018- 57184
Car manufacturer website
The first EV in Mercedes-Benz. The battery capacity is 80kWh, the range is 450km, but it actually has a smaller range, so EQC is likely to be weak on long-distance driving.




Jeep CHEROKEE 2013-

>>Compare photos by overlapping




SUV 　 MPV 　 Hatchback 　 Wagon 　 Sedan 　 Coupe


<< < 1 >

Order of longest length
<< < 1 >



Back to top