Compare photos by overlapping


Mustang vs S60 Recharge T6 AWD Inscription




<First car selection>

Ford

Mustang 2015- 23777

<Second car selection>

VOLVO

S60 Recharge T6 AWD Inscription 2019- 11539





Size comparison


A : Mustang 2015-
B : S60 Recharge T6 AWD Inscription 2019-

name length width height
A 4784mm 1916mm 1381mm
B 4760mm 1850mm 1435mm
difference +24mm +66mm -54mm

name weight Minimum turning radius Drive battery capacity
A 1600kg m kWh
B 2030kg 5.7m 12kWh
difference -430kg -5.7m -12kWh

name Cargo Volume Drive battery capacity cruising range
A L kWh km
B L 12kWh km
difference +0L -12kWh +0km


Max output comparison
name Gasoline engine power Gasoline engine torque Displacement
A ---
B 186kW(253PS)350Nm1968cc
difference ---


EV performance comparison
name Electric motor power Electric motor torque
A kW Nm
B kW Nm
difference +0kW +0Nm


name Drive battery capacity cruising range Acceleration 0-100km/h
A kWh km sec
B 12kWh km sec
difference -12kWh +0km +0sec


Ford Mustang 2015-
Car manufacturer website
The low, overwhelmingly supple form is unique to Ford Mustangs. The ruggedness of American cars is irresistible to fans.


VOLVO S60 Recharge T6 AWD Inscription 2019-
Car manufacturer website
Volvo's middle-sized sedan. As a plug-in hybrid, it becomes 4WD by driving the rear electrically. Maybe because Volvo has a well-established image of a station wagon, I'm the only one who feels like a sedan.






Ford Mustang 2015-

>>Compare photos by overlapping


new!




SUV   MPV   Hatchback   Wagon   Sedan Coupe
<< < 1 >

Order of longest length
<< < 1 >



Back to top