Compare photos by overlapping


CHR HYBRID G vs Q3




<First car selection>

TOYOTA

C-HR HYBRID G 2016- 19821

<Second car selection>

Audi

Q3 2011- 19062





Size comparison


A : C-HR HYBRID G 2016-
B : Q3 2011-

name length width height
A 4360mm 1795mm 1550mm
B 4385mm 1830mm 1615mm
difference -25mm -35mm -65mm

name weight Minimum turning radius Drive battery capacity
A 1480kg 5.2m 1.31kWh
B 1470kg m kWh
difference +10kg +5.2m +1.31kWh

name Cargo Volume Drive battery capacity cruising range
A 318L 1.31kWh km
B L kWh km
difference +318L +1.31kWh +0km


Max output comparison
name Gasoline engine power Gasoline engine torque Displacement
A 72kW(98PS)142Nm1797cc
B ---
difference ---


EV performance comparison
name Electric motor power Electric motor torque
A 53kW 163Nm
B kW Nm
difference +53kW +163Nm


name Drive battery capacity cruising range Acceleration 0-100km/h
A 1.31kWh km sec
B kWh km sec
difference +1.31kWh +0km +0sec


TOYOTA C-HR HYBRID G 2016-
Car manufacturer website
Toyota compact SUV. The styling that thoroughly sticks to its appearance makes us feel the new era of SUV.






Audi Q3 2011-
Car manufacturer website


TOYOTA C-HR HYBRID G 2016-

>>Compare photos by overlapping


new!




SUV   MPV   Hatchback   Wagon   Sedan Coupe
<< < 1 >

Order of longest length
<< < 1 >



Back to top