Compare photos by overlapping


CHR HYBRID G vs EQC 400 4MATIC




<First car selection>

TOYOTA

C-HR HYBRID G 2016- 19273

<Second car selection>

Mercedes-Benz

EQC 400 4MATIC 2018- 58384
#C-HR HYBRID G 2016- + EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-



#C-HR HYBRID G 2016- + EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
#C-HR HYBRID G 2016- + EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-



Size comparison


A : C-HR HYBRID G 2016-
B : EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-

name length width height
A 4360mm 1795mm 1550mm
B 4770mm 1925mm 1625mm
difference -410mm -130mm -75mm
name weight wheelbase Minimum turning radius
A 1480kg 2640mm 5.2m
B 2495kg 2875mm 5.6m
difference -1015kg -235mm -0.4m
name Cargo Volume seats minimum ride height
A 318L 5 140mm
B 500L 5 130mm
difference -182L +0 +10mm


Max output comparison


A : C-HR HYBRID G 2016-
B : EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-

name Gasoline engine power Gasoline engine torque Displacement
A 72kW(98PS)142Nm1797cc
B ---
difference ---

EV performance comparison
name Drive battery capacity cruising range Acceleration 0-100km/h
A 1.31kWh km sec
B 85kWh 471km 5.1sec
difference -83.7kWh -471km -5.1sec



TOYOTA C-HR HYBRID G 2016- 19273
Car manufacturer website
Toyota compact SUV. The styling that thoroughly sticks to its appearance makes us feel the new era of SUV.







Mercedes-Benz EQC 400 4MATIC 2018- 58384
Car manufacturer website
The first EV in Mercedes-Benz. The battery capacity is 80kWh, the range is 450km, but it actually has a smaller range, so EQC is likely to be weak on long-distance driving.




TOYOTA C-HR HYBRID G 2016-

>>Compare photos by overlapping




SUV   MPV   Hatchback   Wagon   Sedan   Coupe


<< < 1 >

Order of longest length
<< < 1 >



Back to top