Compare photos by overlapping


SERENA epower G vs CX5 20S PROACTIVE




＜First car selection＞

NISSAN

SERENA e-power G 2017- 18598

＜Second car selection＞

MAZDA

CX-5 20S PROACTIVE 2017- 56673





Size comparison


A : SERENA e-power G 2017-
B : CX-5 20S PROACTIVE 2017-

name length width height
A 4685mm 1695mm 1865mm
B 4545mm 1840mm 1690mm
difference +140mm -145mm +175mm

name weight Minimum turning radius Drive battery capacity
A 1760kg 5.5m 1.8kWh
B 1530kg 5.5m kWh
difference +230kg +0m +1.8kWh

name Cargo Volume Drive battery capacity cruising range
A L 1.8kWh km
B 500L kWh km
difference -500L +1.8kWh +0km


Max output comparison
name Gasoline engine power Gasoline engine torque Displacement
A 62kW(84PS)103Nm1198cc
B ---
difference ---


EV performance comparison
name Electric motor power Electric motor torque
A 100kW 320Nm
B kW Nm
difference +100kW +320Nm


name Drive battery capacity cruising range Acceleration 0-100km/h
A 1.8kWh km sec
B kWh km sec
difference +1.8kWh +0km +0sec


NISSAN SERENA e-power G 2017-
Car manufacturer website
Even with the large body of a minivan, by using the same power e-power as the EV, there is powerful torque from low speeds, so it is very comfortable. However, the fuel is gasoline and cannot be charged from the outside.
When you actually ride it, it runs powerfully and lightly from the low speed range with the power of electricity. It makes me realize that the heavy minivan and the torque of the motor are very compatible.
When the engine for power generation is not running, the inside of the car is very quiet, but when running slowly in an urban area, when the engine starts, I was a little worried about the engine noise.














MAZDA CX-5 20S PROACTIVE 2017-
Car manufacturer website

NISSAN SERENA e-power G 2017-

>>Compare photos by overlapping


new!




SUV 　 MPV 　 Hatchback 　 Wagon 　 Sedan Coupe
<< < 1 >

Order of longest length
<< < 1 >



Back to top