Compare photos by overlapping
EQC 400 4MATIC vs RANGE ROVER VELAR 250PS
<First car selection>
Mercedes-Benz
EQC 400 4MATIC 2018- 64427
<Second car selection>
LAND ROVER
RANGE ROVER VELAR 250PS 2017- 15875
Size comparison
A : EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
B : RANGE ROVER VELAR 250PS 2017-
name | length | width | height |
---|---|---|---|
A | 4770mm | 1925mm | 1625mm |
B | 4820mm | 1930mm | 1685mm |
difference | -50mm | -5mm | -60mm |
name | weight | wheelbase | Minimum turning radius |
---|---|---|---|
A | 2495kg | 2875mm | 5.6m |
B | 1980kg | 2875mm | 5.6m |
difference | +515kg | +0mm | +0m |
name | Cargo Volume | seats | minimum ride height |
---|---|---|---|
A | 500L | 5 | 130mm |
B | 673L | 5 | 205mm |
difference | -173L | +0 | -75mm |
Max output comparison
A : EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
B : RANGE ROVER VELAR 250PS 2017-
name | Gasoline engine power | Gasoline engine torque | Displacement |
---|---|---|---|
A | - | - | - |
B | 184kW(250PS) | 365Nm | - |
difference | - | - | - |
EV performance comparison
name | Drive battery capacity | cruising range | Acceleration 0-100km/h |
---|---|---|---|
A | 85kWh | 471km | 5.1sec |
B | kWh | km | sec |
difference | +85kWh | +471km | +5.1sec |
Mercedes-Benz EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
64427
Car manufacturer website
The first EV in Mercedes-Benz. The battery capacity is 80kWh, the range is 450km, but it actually has a smaller range, so EQC is likely to be weak on long-distance driving.
LAND ROVER RANGE ROVER VELAR 250PS 2017-
15875
Car manufacturer website
RANGE ROVER middle class SUV. The appearance of the urban image of RANGE ROVER is that the large and low body is cool. The advanced quality of the RANGE ROVER unified interior makes me amazed at the quality.
Mercedes-Benz EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
>>Compare photos by overlapping
SUV MPV Hatchback Wagon Sedan Coupe
Order of longest length
Back to top