Compare photos by overlapping


XM vs SERENA epower G




＜First car selection＞

BMW

XM 2023- 10318

＜Second car selection＞

NISSAN

SERENA e-power G 2017- 19122
#XM 2023- + SERENA e-power G 2017-



#XM 2023- + SERENA e-power G 2017-
#XM 2023- + SERENA e-power G 2017-



Size comparison


A : XM 2023-
B : SERENA e-power G 2017-

name length width height
A 5110mm 2005mm 1755mm
B 4685mm 1695mm 1865mm
difference +425mm +310mm -110mm
name weight wheelbase Minimum turning radius
A 2710kg 3105mm m
B 1760kg 2860mm 5.5m
difference +950kg +245mm -5.5m
name Cargo Volume seats minimum ride height
A L 5 220mm
B L 7 140mm
difference +0L -2 +80mm


Max output comparison


A : XM 2023-
B : SERENA e-power G 2017-

name Gasoline engine power Gasoline engine torque Displacement
A 360kW(490PS)650Nm4395cc
B 62kW(84PS)103Nm1198cc
difference +298kW+547Nm+3197cc

EV performance comparison
name Electric motor power(F) Electric motor torque(F)
A 145kW(197PS)280Nm
B --
difference --
name Drive battery capacity cruising range Acceleration 0-100km/h
A 29kWh km sec
B 1.8kWh km sec
difference +27.2kWh +0km +0sec



BMW XM 2023- 10318
Car manufacturer website



NISSAN SERENA e-power G 2017- 19122
Car manufacturer website
Even with the large body of a minivan, by using the same power e-power as the EV, there is powerful torque from low speeds, so it is very comfortable. However, the fuel is gasoline and cannot be charged from the outside.
When you actually ride it, it runs powerfully and lightly from the low speed range with the power of electricity. It makes me realize that the heavy minivan and the torque of the motor are very compatible.
When the engine for power generation is not running, the inside of the car is very quiet, but when running slowly in an urban area, when the engine starts, I was a little worried about the engine noise.
















BMW XM 2023-

>>Compare photos by overlapping




SUV 　 MPV 　 Hatchback 　 Wagon 　 Sedan 　 Coupe


<< < 1 >

Order of longest length
<< < 1 >



Back to top