Compare photos by overlapping


EQC 400 4MATIC vs RANGE ROVER VELAR 250PS




＜First car selection＞

Mercedes-Benz

EQC 400 4MATIC 2018- 56640

＜Second car selection＞

LAND ROVER

RANGE ROVER VELAR 250PS 2017- 12728
#EQC 400 4MATIC 2018- + RANGE ROVER VELAR 250PS 2017-



#EQC 400 4MATIC 2018- + RANGE ROVER VELAR 250PS 2017-
#EQC 400 4MATIC 2018- + RANGE ROVER VELAR 250PS 2017-



Size comparison


A : EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
B : RANGE ROVER VELAR 250PS 2017-

name length width height
A 4770mm 1925mm 1625mm
B 4820mm 1930mm 1685mm
difference -50mm -5mm -60mm
name weight wheelbase Minimum turning radius
A 2495kg 2875mm 5.6m
B 1980kg 2875mm 5.6m
difference +515kg +0mm +0m
name Cargo Volume seats minimum ride height
A 500L 5 130mm
B 673L 5 205mm
difference -173L +0 -75mm


Max output comparison


A : EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
B : RANGE ROVER VELAR 250PS 2017-

name Gasoline engine power Gasoline engine torque Displacement
A ---
B 184kW(250PS)365Nm-
difference ---

EV performance comparison
name Drive battery capacity cruising range Acceleration 0-100km/h
A 85kWh 471km 5.1sec
B kWh km sec
difference +85kWh +471km +5.1sec



Mercedes-Benz EQC 400 4MATIC 2018- 56640
Car manufacturer website
The first EV in Mercedes-Benz. The battery capacity is 80kWh, the range is 450km, but it actually has a smaller range, so EQC is likely to be weak on long-distance driving.



LAND ROVER RANGE ROVER VELAR 250PS 2017- 12728
Car manufacturer website
RANGE ROVER middle class SUV. The appearance of the urban image of RANGE ROVER is that the large and low body is cool. The advanced quality of the RANGE ROVER unified interior makes me amazed at the quality.




Mercedes-Benz EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-

>>Compare photos by overlapping




SUV 　 MPV 　 Hatchback 　 Wagon 　 Sedan 　 Coupe


<< < 1 >

Order of longest length
<< < 1 >



Back to top