Compare photos by overlapping
Mustang vs RIDGELINE
<First car selection>
Ford
Mustang 2015- 22972
<Second car selection>
HONDA
RIDGELINE 2016- 15462
Size comparison
A : Mustang 2015-
B : RIDGELINE 2016-
name | length | width | height |
---|---|---|---|
A | 4784mm | 1916mm | 1381mm |
B | 5335mm | 1995mm | 1785mm |
difference | -551mm | -79mm | -404mm |
name | weight | wheelbase | Minimum turning radius |
---|---|---|---|
A | 1600kg | mm | m |
B | 1924kg | 3180mm | m |
difference | -324kg | -3180mm | +0m |
name | Cargo Volume | seats | minimum ride height |
---|---|---|---|
A | L | mm | |
B | L | mm | |
difference | +0L | +0 | +0mm |
Max output comparison
A : Mustang 2015-
B : RIDGELINE 2016-
name | Gasoline engine power | Gasoline engine torque | Displacement |
---|---|---|---|
A | - | - | - |
B | 221kW(301PS) | 353Nm | - |
difference | - | - | - |
EV performance comparison
Ford Mustang 2015-
22972
Car manufacturer website
The low, overwhelmingly supple form is unique to Ford Mustangs. The ruggedness of American cars is irresistible to fans.
HONDA RIDGELINE 2016-
15462
Car manufacturer website
Honda pickup truck. The size is imposing, and it is not defeated by Toyota. We are also paying attention to safety, such as equipping advanced safety equipment as standard equipment. Not sold in Japan.
Ford Mustang 2015-
>>Compare photos by overlapping
SUV MPV Hatchback Wagon Sedan Coupe
Order of longest length
Back to top