Compare photos by overlapping


OUTLANDER PHEV G vs SERENA epower G




＜First car selection＞

MITSUBISHI

OUTLANDER PHEV G 2012- 56797

＜Second car selection＞

NISSAN

SERENA e-power G 2017- 19883





Size comparison


A : OUTLANDER PHEV G 2012-
B : SERENA e-power G 2017-

name length width height
A 4655mm 1810mm 1680mm
B 4685mm 1695mm 1865mm
difference -30mm +115mm -185mm

name weight Minimum turning radius Drive battery capacity
A 1890kg 5.3m 12kWh
B 1760kg 5.5m 1.8kWh
difference +130kg -0.2m +10.2kWh

name Cargo Volume Drive battery capacity cruising range
A L 12kWh km
B L 1.8kWh km
difference +0L +10.2kWh +0km


Max output comparison
name Gasoline engine power Gasoline engine torque Displacement
A 87kW(118PS)186Nm1998cc
B 62kW(84PS)103Nm1198cc
difference +25kW+83Nm+800cc


EV performance comparison
name Electric motor power Electric motor torque
A kW Nm
B 100kW 320Nm
difference -100kW -320Nm


name Drive battery capacity cruising range Acceleration 0-100km/h
A 12kWh km sec
B 1.8kWh km sec
difference +10.2kWh +0km +0sec


MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER PHEV G 2012-
Car manufacturer website


NISSAN SERENA e-power G 2017-
Car manufacturer website
Even with the large body of a minivan, by using the same power e-power as the EV, there is powerful torque from low speeds, so it is very comfortable. However, the fuel is gasoline and cannot be charged from the outside.
When you actually ride it, it runs powerfully and lightly from the low speed range with the power of electricity. It makes me realize that the heavy minivan and the torque of the motor are very compatible.
When the engine for power generation is not running, the inside of the car is very quiet, but when running slowly in an urban area, when the engine starts, I was a little worried about the engine noise.














MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER PHEV G 2012-

>>Compare photos by overlapping


new!




SUV 　 MPV 　 Hatchback 　 Wagon 　 Sedan Coupe
<< < 1 >

Order of longest length
<< < 1 >



Back to top