Compare photos by overlapping
X5 xDrive 50e M sports vs RIDGELINE
＜First car selection＞
BMW
X5 xDrive 50e M sports 2023-
＜Second car selection＞
HONDA
RIDGELINE 2016-
Size comparison
A : X5 xDrive 50e M sports 2023-
B : RIDGELINE 2016-
| name | length | width | height |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 4935mm | 2004mm | 1755mm |
| B | 5335mm | 1995mm | 1785mm |
| difference | -400mm | +9mm | -30mm |
| name | weight | Minimum turning radius | Drive battery capacity |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 0kg | m | 25.7kWh |
| B | 1924kg | m | kWh |
| difference | -1924kg | +0m | +25.7kWh |
| name | Cargo Volume | Drive battery capacity | cruising range |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | L | 25.7kWh | 110km |
| B | L | kWh | km |
| difference | +0L | +25.7kWh | +110km |
Max output comparison
| name | Gasoline engine power | Gasoline engine torque | Displacement |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 230kW(313PS) | 450Nm | 2997cc |
| B | 221kW(301PS) | 353Nm | - |
| difference | +9kW | +97Nm | - |
EV performance comparison
| name | Electric motor power | Electric motor torque | |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | kW | Nm | |
| B | kW | Nm | |
| difference | +0kW | +0Nm |
| name | Drive battery capacity | cruising range | Acceleration 0-100km/h |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 25.7kWh | 110km | 4.8sec |
| B | kWh | km | sec |
| difference | +25.7kWh | +110km | +4.8sec |
BMW X5 xDrive 50e M sports 2023-
Car manufacturer website
Car manufacturer website
Honda pickup truck. The size is imposing, and it is not defeated by Toyota. We are also paying attention to safety, such as equipping advanced safety equipment as standard equipment. Not sold in Japan.
BMW X5 xDrive 50e M sports 2023-
>>Compare photos by overlapping
new!
SUV MPV Hatchback Wagon Sedan Coupe Order of longest length
Back to top