Compare photos by overlapping


Mustang vs SERENA epower G




＜First car selection＞

Ford

Mustang 2015- 24831

＜Second car selection＞

NISSAN

SERENA e-power G 2017- 19649





Size comparison


A : Mustang 2015-
B : SERENA e-power G 2017-

name length width height
A 4784mm 1916mm 1381mm
B 4685mm 1695mm 1865mm
difference +99mm +221mm -484mm

name weight Minimum turning radius Drive battery capacity
A 1600kg m kWh
B 1760kg 5.5m 1.8kWh
difference -160kg -5.5m -1.8kWh

name Cargo Volume Drive battery capacity cruising range
A L kWh km
B L 1.8kWh km
difference +0L -1.8kWh +0km


Max output comparison
name Gasoline engine power Gasoline engine torque Displacement
A ---
B 62kW(84PS)103Nm1198cc
difference ---


EV performance comparison
name Electric motor power Electric motor torque
A kW Nm
B 100kW 320Nm
difference -100kW -320Nm


name Drive battery capacity cruising range Acceleration 0-100km/h
A kWh km sec
B 1.8kWh km sec
difference -1.8kWh +0km +0sec


Ford Mustang 2015-
Car manufacturer website
The low, overwhelmingly supple form is unique to Ford Mustangs. The ruggedness of American cars is irresistible to fans.


NISSAN SERENA e-power G 2017-
Car manufacturer website
Even with the large body of a minivan, by using the same power e-power as the EV, there is powerful torque from low speeds, so it is very comfortable. However, the fuel is gasoline and cannot be charged from the outside.
When you actually ride it, it runs powerfully and lightly from the low speed range with the power of electricity. It makes me realize that the heavy minivan and the torque of the motor are very compatible.
When the engine for power generation is not running, the inside of the car is very quiet, but when running slowly in an urban area, when the engine starts, I was a little worried about the engine noise.














Ford Mustang 2015-

>>Compare photos by overlapping


new!




SUV 　 MPV 　 Hatchback 　 Wagon 　 Sedan Coupe
<< < 1 >

Order of longest length
<< < 1 >



Back to top