Compare photos by overlapping
CX8 25S vs RIDGELINE
＜First car selection＞
MAZDA
CX-8 25S 2017-
＜Second car selection＞
HONDA
RIDGELINE 2016-
Size comparison
A : CX-8 25S 2017-
B : RIDGELINE 2016-
| name | length | width | height |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 4900mm | 1840mm | 1730mm |
| B | 5335mm | 1995mm | 1785mm |
| difference | -435mm | -155mm | -55mm |
| name | weight | Minimum turning radius | Drive battery capacity |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1720kg | 5.8m | kWh |
| B | 1924kg | m | kWh |
| difference | -204kg | +5.8m | +0kWh |
| name | Cargo Volume | Drive battery capacity | cruising range |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 239L | kWh | km |
| B | L | kWh | km |
| difference | +239L | +0kWh | +0km |
Max output comparison
| name | Gasoline engine power | Gasoline engine torque | Displacement |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | - | - | - |
| B | 221kW(301PS) | 353Nm | - |
| difference | - | - | - |
EV performance comparison
| name | Electric motor power | Electric motor torque | |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | kW | Nm | |
| B | kW | Nm | |
| difference | +0kW | +0Nm |
| name | Drive battery capacity | cruising range | Acceleration 0-100km/h |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | kWh | km | sec |
| B | kWh | km | sec |
| difference | +0kWh | +0km | +0sec |
MAZDA CX-8 25S 2017-
Car manufacturer website
Car manufacturer website
Honda pickup truck. The size is imposing, and it is not defeated by Toyota. We are also paying attention to safety, such as equipping advanced safety equipment as standard equipment. Not sold in Japan.
MAZDA CX-8 25S 2017-
>>Compare photos by overlapping
new!
SUV MPV Hatchback Wagon Sedan Coupe Order of longest length
Back to top