Compare photos by overlapping
MINI Electric vs CX5 20S PROACTIVE
＜First car selection＞
MINI
MINI Electric 2020-
＜Second car selection＞
MAZDA
CX-5 20S PROACTIVE 2017-
Size comparison
A : MINI Electric 2020-
B : CX-5 20S PROACTIVE 2017-
| name | length | width | height |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 3845mm | 1727mm | 1432mm |
| B | 4545mm | 1840mm | 1690mm |
| difference | -700mm | -113mm | -258mm |
| name | weight | Minimum turning radius | Drive battery capacity |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1440kg | m | 32.6kWh |
| B | 1530kg | 5.5m | kWh |
| difference | -90kg | -5.5m | +32.6kWh |
| name | Cargo Volume | Drive battery capacity | cruising range |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 211L | 32.6kWh | 270km |
| B | 500L | kWh | km |
| difference | -289L | +32.6kWh | +270km |
Max output comparison
| name | Gasoline engine power | Gasoline engine torque | Displacement |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | - | - | - |
| B | - | - | - |
| difference | - | - | - |
EV performance comparison
| name | Electric motor power | Electric motor torque | |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 135kW | 270Nm | |
| B | kW | Nm | |
| difference | +135kW | +270Nm |
| name | Drive battery capacity | cruising range | Acceleration 0-100km/h |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 32.6kWh | 270km | 7.3sec |
| B | kWh | km | sec |
| difference | +32.6kWh | +270km | +7.3sec |
MINI MINI Electric 2020-
Car manufacturer website
MINI's first EV. The small body like a MINI and the price setting that is much easier than the BMW i3 give it a good impression. The i3 was designed exclusively for EVs, such as adopting a carbon platform, but MINI seems to be keeping costs down because it uses the existing MINI platform. Combined with the EV subsidy, there is a possibility that it can be purchased at a fairly reasonable price, and I hope it will become one that can be expected to spread EV.
Car manufacturer website
MINI MINI Electric 2020-
>>Compare photos by overlapping
new!
SUV MPV Hatchback Wagon Sedan Coupe Order of longest length
Back to top