Compare photos by overlapping
EQC 400 4MATIC vs NOTE ePOWER X
<First car selection>
Mercedes-Benz
EQC 400 4MATIC 2018- 63304
<Second car selection>
NISSAN
NOTE e-POWER X 2020- 13964
Size comparison
A : EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
B : NOTE e-POWER X 2020-
name | length | width | height |
---|---|---|---|
A | 4770mm | 1925mm | 1625mm |
B | 4045mm | 1695mm | 1520mm |
difference | +725mm | +230mm | +105mm |
name | weight | wheelbase | Minimum turning radius |
---|---|---|---|
A | 2495kg | 2875mm | 5.6m |
B | 1220kg | 2580mm | 4.9m |
difference | +1275kg | +295mm | +0.7m |
name | Cargo Volume | seats | minimum ride height |
---|---|---|---|
A | 500L | 5 | 130mm |
B | 340L | 5 | 120mm |
difference | +160L | +0 | +10mm |
Max output comparison
A : EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
B : NOTE e-POWER X 2020-
name | Gasoline engine power | Gasoline engine torque | Displacement |
---|---|---|---|
A | - | - | - |
B | 60kW(82PS) | 103Nm | 1198cc |
difference | - | - | - |
EV performance comparison
name | Electric motor power(F) | Electric motor torque(F) | |
---|---|---|---|
A | - | - | |
B | 85kW(116PS) | 280Nm | |
difference | - | - |
name | Drive battery capacity | cruising range | Acceleration 0-100km/h |
---|---|---|---|
A | 85kWh | 471km | 5.1sec |
B | 1.5kWh | km | sec |
difference | +83.5kWh | +471km | +5.1sec |
Mercedes-Benz EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
63304
Car manufacturer website
The first EV in Mercedes-Benz. The battery capacity is 80kWh, the range is 450km, but it actually has a smaller range, so EQC is likely to be weak on long-distance driving.
NISSAN NOTE e-POWER X 2020-
13964
Car manufacturer website
Nissan's compact hatchback. E-POWER, which uses a gasoline engine to generate electricity and runs on electricity. It has evolved further and makes you feel as if you are running on an EV. The texture inside the car has also improved significantly, and you can feel the strength of Nissan.
Mercedes-Benz EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
>>Compare photos by overlapping
SUV MPV Hatchback Wagon Sedan Coupe
Order of longest length
Back to top