Compare photos by overlapping


CHEROKEE vs SERENA epower G




＜First car selection＞

Jeep

CHEROKEE 2013- 13530

＜Second car selection＞

NISSAN

SERENA e-power G 2017- 18765
#CHEROKEE 2013- + SERENA e-power G 2017-



#CHEROKEE 2013- + SERENA e-power G 2017-
#CHEROKEE 2013- + SERENA e-power G 2017-



Size comparison


A : CHEROKEE 2013-
B : SERENA e-power G 2017-

name length width height
A 4665mm 1860mm 1700mm
B 4685mm 1695mm 1865mm
difference -20mm +165mm -165mm
name weight wheelbase Minimum turning radius
A 1760kg mm 5.8m
B 1760kg 2860mm 5.5m
difference +0kg -2860mm +0.3m
name Cargo Volume seats minimum ride height
A L mm
B L 7 140mm
difference +0L -7 -140mm


Max output comparison


A : CHEROKEE 2013-
B : SERENA e-power G 2017-

name Gasoline engine power Gasoline engine torque Displacement
A ---
B 62kW(84PS)103Nm1198cc
difference ---

EV performance comparison
name Drive battery capacity cruising range Acceleration 0-100km/h
A kWh km sec
B 1.8kWh km sec
difference -1.8kWh +0km +0sec



Jeep CHEROKEE 2013- 13530
Car manufacturer website
Compact SUV in JEEP. It has a cute appearance while retaining the atmosphere of JEEP.



NISSAN SERENA e-power G 2017- 18765
Car manufacturer website
Even with the large body of a minivan, by using the same power e-power as the EV, there is powerful torque from low speeds, so it is very comfortable. However, the fuel is gasoline and cannot be charged from the outside.
When you actually ride it, it runs powerfully and lightly from the low speed range with the power of electricity. It makes me realize that the heavy minivan and the torque of the motor are very compatible.
When the engine for power generation is not running, the inside of the car is very quiet, but when running slowly in an urban area, when the engine starts, I was a little worried about the engine noise.
















Jeep CHEROKEE 2013-

>>Compare photos by overlapping




SUV 　 MPV 　 Hatchback 　 Wagon 　 Sedan 　 Coupe


<< < 1 >

Order of longest length
<< < 1 >



Back to top