Compare photos by overlapping
CX5 20S PROACTIVE vs EQC 400 4MATIC
<First car selection>
MAZDA
CX-5 20S PROACTIVE 2017- 56889
<Second car selection>
Mercedes-Benz
EQC 400 4MATIC 2018- 57995
Size comparison
A : CX-5 20S PROACTIVE 2017-
B : EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
name | length | width | height |
---|---|---|---|
A | 4545mm | 1840mm | 1690mm |
B | 4770mm | 1925mm | 1625mm |
difference | -225mm | -85mm | +65mm |
name | weight | wheelbase | Minimum turning radius |
---|---|---|---|
A | 1530kg | 2700mm | 5.5m |
B | 2495kg | 2875mm | 5.6m |
difference | -965kg | -175mm | -0.1m |
name | Cargo Volume | seats | minimum ride height |
---|---|---|---|
A | 500L | 5 | 210mm |
B | 500L | 5 | 130mm |
difference | +0L | +0 | +80mm |
Max output comparison
A : CX-5 20S PROACTIVE 2017-
B : EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
name | Gasoline engine power | Gasoline engine torque | Displacement |
---|---|---|---|
A | - | - | - |
B | - | - | - |
difference | - | - | - |
EV performance comparison
name | Drive battery capacity | cruising range | Acceleration 0-100km/h |
---|---|---|---|
A | kWh | km | sec |
B | 85kWh | 471km | 5.1sec |
difference | -85kWh | -471km | -5.1sec |
MAZDA CX-5 20S PROACTIVE 2017-
56889
Car manufacturer website
Mercedes-Benz EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
57995
Car manufacturer website
The first EV in Mercedes-Benz. The battery capacity is 80kWh, the range is 450km, but it actually has a smaller range, so EQC is likely to be weak on long-distance driving.
MAZDA CX-5 20S PROACTIVE 2017-
>>Compare photos by overlapping
SUV MPV Hatchback Wagon Sedan Coupe
Order of longest length
Back to top