Compare photos by overlapping


CHEROKEE vs EQC 400 4MATIC




<First car selection>

Jeep

CHEROKEE 2013- 14761

<Second car selection>

Mercedes-Benz

EQC 400 4MATIC 2018- 62150





Size comparison


A : CHEROKEE 2013-
B : EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-

name length width height
A 4665mm 1860mm 1700mm
B 4770mm 1925mm 1625mm
difference -105mm -65mm +75mm

name weight Minimum turning radius Drive battery capacity
A 1760kg 5.8m kWh
B 2495kg 5.6m 85kWh
difference -735kg +0.2m -85kWh

name Cargo Volume Drive battery capacity cruising range
A L kWh km
B 500L 85kWh 471km
difference -500L -85kWh -471km


Max output comparison
name Gasoline engine power Gasoline engine torque Displacement
A ---
B ---
difference ---


EV performance comparison
name Electric motor power Electric motor torque
A kW Nm
B 300kW 760Nm
difference -300kW -760Nm


name Drive battery capacity cruising range Acceleration 0-100km/h
A kWh km sec
B 85kWh 471km 5.1sec
difference -85kWh -471km -5.1sec


Jeep CHEROKEE 2013-
Car manufacturer website
Compact SUV in JEEP. It has a cute appearance while retaining the atmosphere of JEEP.


Mercedes-Benz EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
Car manufacturer website
The first EV in Mercedes-Benz. The battery capacity is 80kWh, the range is 450km, but it actually has a smaller range, so EQC is likely to be weak on long-distance driving.


Jeep CHEROKEE 2013-

>>Compare photos by overlapping


new!




SUV   MPV   Hatchback   Wagon   Sedan Coupe
<< < 1 >

Order of longest length
<< < 1 >



Back to top