Compare photos by overlapping


KONA vs SIENTA




＜First car selection＞

HYUNDAI

KONA 2017- 51780

＜Second car selection＞

TOYOTA

SIENTA 2015- 77374





Size comparison


A : KONA 2017-
B : SIENTA 2015-

name length width height
A 4165mm 1800mm 1565mm
B 4260mm 1695mm 1675mm
difference -95mm +105mm -110mm

name weight Minimum turning radius Drive battery capacity
A 0kg m kWh
B 1380kg 5.2m 0.94kWh
difference -1380kg -5.2m -0.94kWh

name Cargo Volume Drive battery capacity cruising range
A L kWh km
B 152L 0.94kWh 1km
difference -152L -0.94kWh -1km


Max output comparison
name Gasoline engine power Gasoline engine torque Displacement
A ---
B 54kW(73PS)111Nm1496cc
difference ---


EV performance comparison
name Electric motor power Electric motor torque
A kW Nm
B kW Nm
difference +0kW +0Nm


name Drive battery capacity cruising range Acceleration 0-100km/h
A kWh km sec
B 0.94kWh 1km sec
difference -0.94kWh -1km +0sec


HYUNDAI KONA 2017-
Car manufacturer website
Hyundai's small SUV is said to have been developed to compete with the Nissan JUDE. Low and wide compared to Juke, for small families.


TOYOTA SIENTA 2015-
Car manufacturer website
A stylish minivan with a sliding door. Toyota's strong hybrid achieves low fuel consumption even for 7 people.
When I actually own it, the electric sliding door is very convenient. It's a minivan, but it's not too big, so you can easily go shopping with your family. With a CVT, the car body is a little heavy, so if you step on the accelerator a lot, the engine will swell, but there is no problem with running leisurely. It's a full hybrid, so at low speeds, you can drive on electricity alone.
Although it is a minivan, if you drive carefully, it will run lightly with high fuel efficiency of over 20km / L, so it is easy on your wallet.
I was able to run about 700km with one refueling.












HYUNDAI KONA 2017-

>>Compare photos by overlapping


new!




SUV 　 MPV 　 Hatchback 　 Wagon 　 Sedan Coupe
<< < 1 >

Order of longest length
<< < 1 >



Back to top