Compare photos by overlapping


XM vs RIDGELINE




<First car selection>

BMW

XM 2023- 10255

<Second car selection>

HONDA

RIDGELINE 2016- 15844





Size comparison


A : XM 2023-
B : RIDGELINE 2016-

name length width height
A 5110mm 2005mm 1755mm
B 5335mm 1995mm 1785mm
difference -225mm +10mm -30mm

name weight Minimum turning radius Drive battery capacity
A 2710kg m 29kWh
B 1924kg m kWh
difference +786kg +0m +29kWh

name Cargo Volume Drive battery capacity cruising range
A L 29kWh km
B L kWh km
difference +0L +29kWh +0km


Max output comparison
name Gasoline engine power Gasoline engine torque Displacement
A 360kW(490PS)650Nm4395cc
B 221kW(301PS)353Nm-
difference +139kW+297Nm-


EV performance comparison
name Electric motor power Electric motor torque
A kW Nm
B kW Nm
difference +0kW +0Nm


name Drive battery capacity cruising range Acceleration 0-100km/h
A 29kWh km sec
B kWh km sec
difference +29kWh +0km +0sec


BMW XM 2023-
Car manufacturer website


HONDA RIDGELINE 2016-
Car manufacturer website
Honda pickup truck. The size is imposing, and it is not defeated by Toyota. We are also paying attention to safety, such as equipping advanced safety equipment as standard equipment. Not sold in Japan.


BMW XM 2023-

>>Compare photos by overlapping


new!




SUV   MPV   Hatchback   Wagon   Sedan Coupe
<< < 1 >

Order of longest length
<< < 1 >



Back to top