Compare photos by overlapping
MX5 MT vs EQA 250
＜First car selection＞
MAZDA
MX-5 MT 2015-
＜Second car selection＞
Mercedes-Benz
EQA 250 2021-
Size comparison
A : MX-5 MT 2015-
B : EQA 250 2021-
| name | length | width | height |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 3915mm | 1735mm | 1235mm |
| B | 4463mm | 1834mm | 1620mm |
| difference | -548mm | -99mm | -385mm |
| name | weight | Minimum turning radius | Drive battery capacity |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1010kg | 4.7m | kWh |
| B | 2040kg | m | 79.8kWh |
| difference | -1030kg | +4.7m | -79.8kWh |
| name | Cargo Volume | Drive battery capacity | cruising range |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | L | kWh | km |
| B | 340L | 79.8kWh | 426km |
| difference | -340L | -79.8kWh | -426km |
Max output comparison
| name | Gasoline engine power | Gasoline engine torque | Displacement |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 97kW(132PS) | 152Nm | 1496cc |
| B | - | - | - |
| difference | - | - | - |
EV performance comparison
| name | Electric motor power | Electric motor torque | |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | kW | Nm | |
| B | 140kW | 375Nm | |
| difference | -140kW | -375Nm |
| name | Drive battery capacity | cruising range | Acceleration 0-100km/h |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | kWh | km | sec |
| B | 79.8kWh | 426km | 8.9sec |
| difference | -79.8kWh | -426km | -8.9sec |
MAZDA MX-5 MT 2015-
Car manufacturer website
Mazda convertible, FR lightweight sports car. The beautiful style and beautiful painting are eye-catching. The light running that comes from the lightweight and compact body makes it easy to enjoy sports driving.
Car manufacturer website
Mercedes-Benz compact SUV EV. The EVs already on the market have EQC, but they are quite large SUVs. On the other hand, EQA is an EV that is a little more affordable and a little more affordable. Although the exterior and interior are similar to GLA, I like the fact that it has an advanced feel as an EV.
MAZDA MX-5 MT 2015-
>>Compare photos by overlapping
new!
SUV MPV Hatchback Wagon Sedan Coupe Order of longest length
Back to top