Compare photos by overlapping


MUX vs EQC 400 4MATIC




＜First car selection＞

ISUZU

MU-X 2013- 51103

＜Second car selection＞

Mercedes-Benz

EQC 400 4MATIC 2018- 57200
#MU-X 2013- + EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-



#MU-X 2013- + EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
#MU-X 2013- + EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-



Size comparison


A : MU-X 2013-
B : EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-

name length width height
A 190inch 73.2inch 71.9inch
B 187.8inch 75.8inch 64inch
difference +2.2inch -2.6inch +7.9inch
name weight wheelbase Minimum turning radius
A 0kg 0inch 0m
B 2495kg 113.2inch 220.5m
difference -2495kg -113.2inch -220.5m
name Cargo Volume seats minimum ride height
A L 0inch
B 500L 5 5.1inch
difference -500L -5 -5.1inch


Max output comparison


A : MU-X 2013-
B : EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-

name Gasoline engine power Gasoline engine torque Displacement
A ---
B ---
difference ---

EV performance comparison
name Drive battery capacity cruising range Acceleration 0-100km/h
A kWh km sec
B 85kWh 471km 5.1sec
difference -85kWh -471km -5.1sec



ISUZU MU-X 2013- 51103
Car manufacturer website
Although designed in 2013, its powerful driving and appearance make you feel like you can go anywhere. Only the makers who mainly make trucks can't help but tough.



Mercedes-Benz EQC 400 4MATIC 2018- 57200
Car manufacturer website
The first EV in Mercedes-Benz. The battery capacity is 80kWh, the range is 450km, but it actually has a smaller range, so EQC is likely to be weak on long-distance driving.




ISUZU MU-X 2013-

>>Compare photos by overlapping




SUV 　 MPV 　 Hatchback 　 Wagon 　 Sedan 　 Coupe


<< < 1 >

Order of longest length
<< < 1 >



Back to top