Compare photos by overlapping
CX5 20S PROACTIVE vs MINI Electric
<First car selection>
MAZDA
CX-5 20S PROACTIVE 2017- 56608
<Second car selection>
MINI
MINI Electric 2020- 12093
Size comparison
A : CX-5 20S PROACTIVE 2017-
B : MINI Electric 2020-
name | length | width | height |
---|---|---|---|
A | 4545mm | 1840mm | 1690mm |
B | 3845mm | 1727mm | 1432mm |
difference | +700mm | +113mm | +258mm |
name | weight | wheelbase | Minimum turning radius |
---|---|---|---|
A | 1530kg | 2700mm | 5.5m |
B | 1440kg | 2495mm | m |
difference | +90kg | +205mm | +5.5m |
name | Cargo Volume | seats | minimum ride height |
---|---|---|---|
A | 500L | 5 | 210mm |
B | 211L | mm | |
difference | +289L | +5 | +210mm |
Max output comparison
A : CX-5 20S PROACTIVE 2017-
B : MINI Electric 2020-
name | Gasoline engine power | Gasoline engine torque | Displacement |
---|---|---|---|
A | - | - | - |
B | - | - | - |
difference | - | - | - |
EV performance comparison
name | Drive battery capacity | cruising range | Acceleration 0-100km/h |
---|---|---|---|
A | kWh | km | sec |
B | 32.6kWh | 270km | 7.3sec |
difference | -32.6kWh | -270km | -7.3sec |
MAZDA CX-5 20S PROACTIVE 2017-
56608
Car manufacturer website
MINI MINI Electric 2020-
12093
Car manufacturer website
MINI's first EV. The small body like a MINI and the price setting that is much easier than the BMW i3 give it a good impression. The i3 was designed exclusively for EVs, such as adopting a carbon platform, but MINI seems to be keeping costs down because it uses the existing MINI platform. Combined with the EV subsidy, there is a possibility that it can be purchased at a fairly reasonable price, and I hope it will become one that can be expected to spread EV.
MAZDA CX-5 20S PROACTIVE 2017-
>>Compare photos by overlapping
SUV MPV Hatchback Wagon Sedan Coupe
Order of longest length
Back to top