Compare photos by overlapping


COSMO Sport vs EQC 400 4MATIC




＜First car selection＞

MAZDA

COSMO Sport 1967-1972 14948

＜Second car selection＞

Mercedes-Benz

EQC 400 4MATIC 2018- 58045
#COSMO Sport 1967-1972 + EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-



#COSMO Sport 1967-1972 + EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
#COSMO Sport 1967-1972 + EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-



Size comparison


A : COSMO Sport 1967-1972
B : EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-

name length width height
A 4140mm 1595mm 1165mm
B 4770mm 1925mm 1625mm
difference -630mm -330mm -460mm
name weight wheelbase Minimum turning radius
A 940kg 2200mm m
B 2495kg 2875mm 5.6m
difference -1555kg -675mm -5.6m
name Cargo Volume seats minimum ride height
A L 2 mm
B 500L 5 130mm
difference -500L -3 -130mm


Max output comparison


A : COSMO Sport 1967-1972
B : EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-

name Gasoline engine power Gasoline engine torque Displacement
A --982cc
B ---
difference ---

EV performance comparison
name Drive battery capacity cruising range Acceleration 0-100km/h
A kWh km sec
B 85kWh 471km 5.1sec
difference -85kWh -471km -5.1sec



MAZDA COSMO Sport 1967-1972 14948
Car manufacturer website
Mazda sports coupe. The design reminiscent of a novel spaceship will not fade over time. This is the world's first mass-produced vehicle equipped with a rotary engine.





Mercedes-Benz EQC 400 4MATIC 2018- 58045
Car manufacturer website
The first EV in Mercedes-Benz. The battery capacity is 80kWh, the range is 450km, but it actually has a smaller range, so EQC is likely to be weak on long-distance driving.




MAZDA COSMO Sport 1967-1972

>>Compare photos by overlapping




SUV 　 MPV 　 Hatchback 　 Wagon 　 Sedan 　 Coupe


<< < 1 >

Order of longest length
<< < 1 >



Back to top