Compare photos by overlapping
COSMO Sport vs EQC 400 4MATIC
＜First car selection＞
MAZDA
COSMO Sport 1967-1972
＜Second car selection＞
Mercedes-Benz
EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
Size comparison
A : COSMO Sport 1967-1972
B : EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
| name | length | width | height |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 4140mm | 1595mm | 1165mm |
| B | 4770mm | 1925mm | 1625mm |
| difference | -630mm | -330mm | -460mm |
| name | weight | Minimum turning radius | Drive battery capacity |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 940kg | m | kWh |
| B | 2495kg | 5.6m | 85kWh |
| difference | -1555kg | -5.6m | -85kWh |
| name | Cargo Volume | Drive battery capacity | cruising range |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | L | kWh | km |
| B | 500L | 85kWh | 471km |
| difference | -500L | -85kWh | -471km |
Max output comparison
| name | Gasoline engine power | Gasoline engine torque | Displacement |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | - | - | 982cc |
| B | - | - | - |
| difference | - | - | - |
EV performance comparison
| name | Electric motor power | Electric motor torque | |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | kW | Nm | |
| B | 300kW | 760Nm | |
| difference | -300kW | -760Nm |
| name | Drive battery capacity | cruising range | Acceleration 0-100km/h |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | kWh | km | sec |
| B | 85kWh | 471km | 5.1sec |
| difference | -85kWh | -471km | -5.1sec |
MAZDA COSMO Sport 1967-1972
Car manufacturer website
Mazda sports coupe. The design reminiscent of a novel spaceship will not fade over time. This is the world's first mass-produced vehicle equipped with a rotary engine.
Car manufacturer website
The first EV in Mercedes-Benz. The battery capacity is 80kWh, the range is 450km, but it actually has a smaller range, so EQC is likely to be weak on long-distance driving.
MAZDA COSMO Sport 1967-1972
>>Compare photos by overlapping
new!
SUV MPV Hatchback Wagon Sedan Coupe Order of longest length
Back to top