Compare photos by overlapping
EQC 400 4MATIC vs RANGE ROVER VELAR 250PS
＜First car selection＞
Mercedes-Benz
EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
＜Second car selection＞
LAND ROVER
RANGE ROVER VELAR 250PS 2017-
Size comparison
A : EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
B : RANGE ROVER VELAR 250PS 2017-
| name | length | width | height |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 4770mm | 1925mm | 1625mm |
| B | 4820mm | 1930mm | 1685mm |
| difference | -50mm | -5mm | -60mm |
| name | weight | Minimum turning radius | Drive battery capacity |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 2495kg | 5.6m | 85kWh |
| B | 1980kg | 5.6m | kWh |
| difference | +515kg | +0m | +85kWh |
| name | Cargo Volume | Drive battery capacity | cruising range |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 500L | 85kWh | 471km |
| B | 673L | kWh | km |
| difference | -173L | +85kWh | +471km |
Max output comparison
| name | Gasoline engine power | Gasoline engine torque | Displacement |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | - | - | - |
| B | 184kW(250PS) | 365Nm | - |
| difference | - | - | - |
EV performance comparison
| name | Electric motor power | Electric motor torque | |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 300kW | 760Nm | |
| B | kW | Nm | |
| difference | +300kW | +760Nm |
| name | Drive battery capacity | cruising range | Acceleration 0-100km/h |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 85kWh | 471km | 5.1sec |
| B | kWh | km | sec |
| difference | +85kWh | +471km | +5.1sec |
Mercedes-Benz EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
Car manufacturer website
The first EV in Mercedes-Benz. The battery capacity is 80kWh, the range is 450km, but it actually has a smaller range, so EQC is likely to be weak on long-distance driving.
Car manufacturer website
RANGE ROVER middle class SUV. The appearance of the urban image of RANGE ROVER is that the large and low body is cool. The advanced quality of the RANGE ROVER unified interior makes me amazed at the quality.
Mercedes-Benz EQC 400 4MATIC 2018-
>>Compare photos by overlapping
new!
SUV MPV Hatchback Wagon Sedan Coupe Order of longest length
Back to top